In this quick video guide I will show you how to fix the error:No bootfile found for UEFI!Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI!I had this problem on my . 1.0.84 IA32 www.ventoy.net ===>
bionicpup64-8.0-uefi.iso Legacy+UEFI tested with VM, ZeroShell-3.9.3-X86.iso Legacy tested with VM, slax-64bit-9.11.0.iso Legacy tested with VM. see http://tinycorelinux.net/13.x/x86_64/release/ Thank you! Adding an efi boot file to the directory does not make an iso uefi-bootable. But when I try to boot it with ventoy it does not boot and says the message "No bootfile found for UEFI". Don't get me wrong, I understand your concerns and support your position. DokanMounter
I can provide an option in ventoy.json for user who want to bypass secure boot. fdisk: Create a primary partition with partition type EFI (FAT-12/16/32). Currently there is only a Secure boot support option for check. Windows 11 21h2 x64 Hebrew - Successfully tested on UFEI. FreeNAS-11.3-U2.1.iso (FreeBSD based) tested using ventoy-1.0.08 hung during boot in both bios and uefi at the following error; da1: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present In that case there's no difference in booting from USB or plugging in a SATA or NVMe drive with the same content as you'd put on USB (and we can debate about intrusion detection if you want). Which is why you want to have as many of these enabled in parallel when they exist (such as TPM + Secure Boot, i.e. and select the efisys.bin from desktop and save the .iso Now the Minitool.iso should boot into UEFI with Ventoy. If everything is fine, I'll prepare the repo, prettify the code and write detailed compilation and usage instructions, as well as help @ventoy with integration. That's an improvement, I guess? There are also third-party tools that can be used to check faulty or fake USB sticks. Guid For Ventoy With Secure Boot in UEFI I cannot boot into Ventoy with Secure Boot enabled on my machine though, it only boots when I disable Secure Boot in BIOS. But even the user answer "YES, I don't care, just boot it." Both are good. So the new ISO file can be booted fine in a secure boot enviroment. This was not considered Secure Boot violation as ExitBootServices() was called prior to booting the kernel. Many thanks! Already on GitHub? @pbatard For secure boot please refer Secure Boot . If Secure Boot is not enabled, proceed as normal. ElementaryOS boots just fine. By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and Have a question about this project? The thing is, the Windows injection that Ventoy usse can be applied to an extracted ISO (i.e. I will give more clear warning message for unsigned efi file when secure boot is enabled. Thank you very much for adding new ISOs and features. For instance, if you produce digitally signed software for Windows, to ensure that your users can validate that when they run an application, they can tell with certainty whether it comes from you or not, you really don't want someone to install software on the user computer that will suddenly make applications that weren't signed by you look as if they were signed by you. WinPE10_8_Sergei_Strelec_x86_x64_2019.12.28_English.iso BOOT but Custom launcher cannot open custom path and unable access to special apps. However, I would say that, if you are already running "arbritrary" code in UEFI mode to display a user message, while Secure Boot is enabled, then you should be able to craft your own LoadImage()/StarImage() that doesn't go through SB validation (by copying the LoadImage()/StarImage() code from the EDK2 and removing the validation part). then there is no point in implementing a USB-based Secure Boot loader. Unsigned bootloader Linux ISOs or ISOs without UEFI support does not boot with Secure Boot enabled. @ventoy Thank you both for your replies. Users can update Ventoy by installing the latest version or using VentoyU, a Ventoy updater utility. This filesystem offers better compatibility with Window OS, macOS, and Linux. I made Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk with that exact purpose: to bypass Secure Boot validation policy. etc. Test these ISO files with Vmware firstly. Yeah, I think UEFI LoadImage()/StarImage(), which is what you'd call to chain load the UEFI bootloader, are set to validate the loaded image for Secure Boot and not launch it for unsigned/broken images, if Secure Boot is enabled (but I admit I haven't formally validated that). If someone uses Ventoy with Secure Boot, then Ventoy should not green light UEFI bootloaders that don't comply with Secure Boot. I'm not sure whether Ventoy should try to boot Linux kernel without any verification in this case (. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. Ventoy is an open source tool to create a bootable USB drive for ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD (x)/EFI files. I don't know why. The injection is just like that I extract the ubuntu.iso and change/add some script and create an new ISO file. So, I'm trying to install Arch, but after selecting Arch from Ventoy I keep getting told that "No Bootfile found for UEFI! Any ideas? And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. . Most of modern computers come with Secure Boot enabled by default, which is a requirement for Windows 10 certification process. Remove the Windows 7 installation CD/DVD from the disc tray, type exit in Command Prompt and press Enter. By the way, this issue could be closed, couldn't it? When secure boot is enabled, only .efi/kernel/drivers need to be signed. @BxOxSxS Please test these ISO files in Virtual Machine (e.g. Last time I tried that usb flash was nearly full, maybe thats why I couldnt do it. yes, but i try with rufus, yumi, winsetuptousb, its okay. Option2: Use Ventoy's grub which is signed with MS key. The main annoyance in my view is that it requires 2 points of contact for security updates (per https://github.com/rhboot/shim-review) and that I have some doubts that Microsoft will allow anything but a formal organization with more than a couple of people to become a SHIM provider. EDIT: For these who select to bypass secure boot. Already on GitHub? Then your life is simplified to Persistence management while each of the 2 (Ventoy or SG2D) provide the ability to boot Windows if it is installed on any local . Download non-free firmware archive. screenshots if possible So it is impossible to get these ISOs to work with ventoy without enabling legacy support in the bios settings? Menu Option-->Secure Boot Support for Ventoy2Disk.exe and -s option for Ventoy2Disk.sh We recommend downloading this PC Repair tool (rated Great on TrustPilot.com) to easily address them. You can install Ventoy to USB drive, Removable HD, SD Card, SATA HDD, SSD, NVMe . Keeping Ventoy and ISO files updated can help avoid any future booting issues with Ventoy. And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. So even when someone physically unplugs my SSD and installs a malicious bootloader/OS to it, it won't be able to decrypt the main OS partition. For instance, someone could produce a Windows installation ISO that contains a malicious /efi/boot/bootx64.efi, and, currently, Ventoy will happily boot that ISO even if Secure Boot is enabled. slitaz-next-180716.iso, Symantec.Ghost.Boot.CD.12.0.0.10658.x64.iso, regular-xfce-latest-x86_64.iso - 1.22 GB No. Does the iso boot from s VM as a virtual DVD? Vmware) with UEFI mode and to confirm that the ISO file does support UEFI mode. This means current is ARM64 UEFI mode. And if you somehow let bootloaders that shouldn't be trusted through, such as unsigned ones, then it means your whole chain of trust is utterly broken, because there simply cannot even exist a special case for "USB" vs "something else". If you look at UEFI firmware settings, you will usually see that CSM and Secure Boot cannot be enabled at the same time, for this precise reason. Vmware) with UEFI mode and to confirm that the ISO file does support UEFI mode. These WinPE have different user scripts inside the ISO files. In Ventoy I had enabled Secure Boot and GPT. It was working for hours before finally failing with a non-specific error. Guiding you with how-to advice, news and tips to upgrade your tech life. unsigned .efi file still can not be chainloaded. Single x64 ISO - OK - Works and install.esd found by Setup - all Editions listed Dual 32+64 ISO - FAIL - Did not find install.esd file (either 64 or 32) \x64\sources\ and \x32\sources in ISO UEFI64 Boot: Single x64 ISO - FAIL - 'No boot file found by UEFI' ' Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI!' Can it boot ok? I have the same error, I can boot from the same usb, the same iso file and the same Ventoy on asus vivobook but not on asus ROG. openSUSE-Tumbleweed-XFCE-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200402-Media - 925 MB, star-kirk-2.1.0-xfce-amd64-live.iso - 518 MB, Porteus-CINNAMON-v5.0rc1-x86_64.iso - 300 MB The user could choose to run a Microsoft Windows Install ISO downloaded from the MS servers and Ventoy could inject a malicious file into it as it boots. Do I still need to display a warning message? Freebsd has some linux compatibility and also has proprietary nvidia drivers. Else I would have disabled Secure Boot altogether, since the end result it the same. Already have an account? You signed in with another tab or window. Passware Kit Forensic , on Legacy mode booting successfully but on UEFI returns to Ventoy. check manjaro-gnome, not working. Ventoy does support Windows 10 and 11 and users can bypass the Windows 11 hardware check when installing. I'll fix it. @ventoy I have tested on laptop Lenovo Ideapad Z570 and Memtest86-4.3.7.iso and ipxe.iso gived same error but with additional information: netboot.xyz-efi.iso (v2.0.17), manjaro-gnome-20.0.3-200606-linux56.iso, Windows10_PLx64_2004.iso worked fine. mishab_mizzunet 1 yr. ago Set the VM to UEFI mode and connect the ISO file directly to the VM and boot. To create a USB stick that is compatible with USB 3.0 using the native boot experience of the Windows 10 Technical Preview media (or Windows 8/Windows 8.1), use DiskPart to format the USB stick and set the partition to active, then copy all of the files from inside the ISO . https://osdn.net/projects/manjaro/storage/kde/, https://abf.openmandriva.org/platforms/cooker/products/4/product_build_lists/3250, https://abf.openmandriva.org/product_build_lists, chromeos_14816.99.0_reven_recovery_stable-channel_mp-v2.bin, https://github.com/rescuezilla/rescuezilla/releases/download/2.4/rescuezilla-2.4-64bit.jammy.iso, https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mv6Cbew_y8&t=1m13s, https://mega.nz/folder/TI8ECBKY#i89YUsA0rCJp9kTClz3VlA. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. Now there's no need to format the disk again and again or to extract anything-- with Ventoy simply copy the ISO file to the USB drive and boot it. So, yeah, if you have access to to the hardware, then Secure Boot, TPM or whatever security measure you currently have on consumer-grade products, is pretty much useless because, as long as you can swap hardware components around, or even touch the hardware (to glitch the RAM for instance), then unless the TPM comes with an X-Ray machine that can scan and compare hardware components, you're going to have a very hard time plugging all the many holes through which a dedicated attacker can gain access to your data. what is the working solution? This seem to be disabled in Ventoy's custom GRUB). Tested on 1.0.77. Do NOT put the file to the 32MB VTOYEFI partition. You can open the ISO in 7zip and look for yourself. Ubuntu has shim which load only Ubuntu, etc. On the other hand, the expectation is that most users would only get the warning very occasionally, and you definitely want to bring to their attention that they might want to be careful about the current bootloader they are trying to boot, in case they haven't paid that much attention to where they got their image @ventoy, @pbatard, any comments on my solution? 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. The file formats that Ventoy supports include ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD(x), EFI files. all give ERROR on HP Laptop : I will not release 1.1.0 until a relatively perfect secure boot solution. Only in 2019 the signature validation was enforced. How did you get it to be listed by Ventoy? Have you tried grub mode before loading the ISO? With that with recent versions, all seems to work fine. I tested Manjaro ISO KDE X64. We talk about secure boot, not secure system. I remember that @adrian15 tried to create a sets of fully trusted chainload chains Background Some of us have bad habits when using USB flash drive and often pull it out directly. @steve6375 I still don't know why it shouldn't work even if it's complex. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: tails-amd64-4.5.iso Legacy tested with VM If anyone has an issue - please state full and accurate details. So all Ventoy's behavior doesn't change the secure boot policy. Would disabling Secure Boot in Ventoy help? Where can I download MX21_February_x64.iso? "No bootfile found for UEFI! All the userspace applications don't need to be signed. @chromer030 hello. Earlier (2014-2019) official GRUB in Ubuntu and Debian allowed to boot any Linux kernel, even unsigned one, in Secure Boot mode. I'm hoping other people can test and report because it will most likely be a few weeks before this can make it to the top of my priority list @ventoy, are you interested in a proper implementation of Secure Boot support? You signed in with another tab or window. It implements the following features: This preloader allows to use Ventoy with proper Secure Boot verification. @steve6375 Worked fine for me on my Thinkpad T420. Nevertheless, thanks for the explanation, it cleared up some things for me around the threat model of Secure Boot. Thank you Maybe I can provide 2 options for the user in the install program or by plugin. Some modern systems are not compatible with Windows 7 UEFI64 (may hang) I would assert that, when Secure Boot is enabled, every single time an unsigned bootloader is loaded, a warning message should be displayed. I'll try looking into the changelog on the deb package and see if The point of this issue is that people are under the impression that because Ventoy supports Secure Boot, they will get the same level of "security" booting Secure Boot compliant media through Ventoy as if they had booted that same media directly, which is indeed a fair expectation to have, since the whole point of boot media creation software is to have the converted media behave as close as possible as the original would. I assume that file-roller is not preserving boot parameters, use another iso creation tool. So maybe Ventoy also need a shim as fedora/ubuntu does. Does it work on these machines (real or emulated) by booting it from a CDR / .iso image? ISO file name (full exact name) I'd be interested in a shim for Rufus as well, since I have the same issue with wanting UEFI:NTFS signed for Secure Boot, but using GRUB 2 code for the driver, that makes Secure Boot signing it impossible. I hope there will be no issues in this adoption. Ventoy Version 1.0.78 What about latest release Yes. MEMZ.img is 4K and Ventoy does not list it in it's menu system. In Linux, you need to specify the device to install Ventoy which can be a USB drive or local disk. The user has Ubuntu, Fedora and OpenSUSE ISOs which they want to load. But, UEFI:NTFS is not a SHIM and that's actually the reason why it could be signed by Microsoft (once I switched the bootloader license from GPLv3+ to GPLv2+ and rewrote a UEFI driver derived from GPLv2+ code, which I am definitely not happy at all about), because, in a Secure Boot enabled environment, it can not be used to chain load anything that isn't itself Secure Boot signed. So, Secure Boot is not required for TPM-based encryption to work correctly. It was actually quite the struggle to get to that stage (expensive too!) FFS I just spent hours reinstalling arch just to get this in the end archlinux-2021.06.01-x86_64.iso with Ventoy 1.0.47 boots for me on Lenovo IdeaPad 300 UEFI64 boot. Yes. Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-32-1.6.iso: Works fine, all hard drive can be properly detected. Ventoy is able to chain boot Windows 10 (build 2004) just fine on the same systems. espero les sirva, pueden usar rufus, ventoy, easy to boot, etc. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. Best Regards. https://abf.openmandriva.org/platforms/cooker/products/4/product_build_lists/3250 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1401532. chromeos_14816.99.0_reven_recovery_stable-channel_mp-v2.bin fails to boot on BIOS & UEFI. The user should be notified when booting an unsigned efi file. I've been trying to do something I've done a milliion times before: This has always worked for me. Edit: Disabling Secure Boot didn't help. Thank you for your suggestions!